Want to know how much website downtime costs, and the impact it can have on your business?
Find out everything you need to know in our new uptime monitoring whitepaper 2021
Facebook users in the UK will be able to benefit from a controversial new feature that allows users, ordinary members of the public, to pay to send Facebook messages to celebrities and other people who they’re not otherwise able to connect with.
This feature, said to have been rolled out to prevent celebrities being bombarded with messages from fans – or as Facebook refer to it “spam” – has been live in the US since December, but the UK is one of a further 36 countries now being trialled.
By paying the fee to message a celebrity users will be able to ensure that their messages goes directly to the celebrity’s in-box rather than the “other” less visible folders which captures all messages from people not within the user’s circle of friends.
How much will it cost?
The cost of sending a message to your favourite celebrity will depend on a “fame” algorithm which takes into account numerous factors including the number of followers that the celebrity has on their Facebook account – though Facebook have made it clear that a higher price to message one celebrity over another does not necessarily make them more “famous”!
In January of this year Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder, set a fee of £61 to contact him. Zuckerberg believes that Facebook messaging will become an alternative to email. The recent launch of Facebook Home and integration with phone operating systems is part of this strategy of making Facebook the conduit for all communications – and it’s certainly suggested by some that Facebook will not only become an alternative to email, but will replace SMS messaging as well.
What has the reaction been?
Facebook have come under some criticism for this latest move as they’d always said that the site would be “free and always will be.” Whether Facebook user’s will pay to message their favourite celebrity remains to be seen, particularly when Twitter allows users them to contact them for free.
It will also be interesting to see how celebrities react to this charging structure. Whilst some may be pleased that Facebook is saving them from being bombarded with fan-mail, there will almost certainly be others who feel, publicly at least, that their fans should be able to contact them for free.
And how long before a celebrity argues that Facebook should be giving them a cut of any revenues generated through messages sent to them? After all if Facebook are able to charge £10.68 to message Tom Daley, and that price is determined and is trading off his “personality”, surely most of the revenue should go to him?
For those Facebook users with shallower pockets then for 71p you can contact the UK government’s culture secretary Jeremy Hunt, the comedians Bill Bailey and Miranda Hart or Prince Harry’s girlfriend Cressida Bonas.
We’re pleased to say that you can always message the StatusCake team on Facebook for free!
James Barnes, StatusCake.com
James Barnes
Share this
More from StatusCake
When Code Becomes Cheap: The New Reliability Constraint in Software Engineering
4 min read How AI Is Shifting Software Engineering’s Primary Constraint For most of the history of software engineering, the primary constraint was production. Code was expensive, skilled engineers were scarce, and shipping features required concentrated human effort. Velocity was limited by how fast people could reason, implement, test, and deploy. That constraint shaped everything from team size,
James Barnes
March 25, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 3)
5 min read Autonomous Code, Trust Boundaries, and Why Governance Now Matters More Than Ever In Part 1, we looked at how AI has reduced the cost of building monitoring tools. Then in Part 2, we explored the operational and economic burden of owning them. Now we need to talk about something deeper. Because the real shift isn’t
James Barnes
March 18, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 2)
6 min read The Real Cost of Owning Monitoring Isn’t Code — It’s Everything Else In Part 1, we explored how AI has dramatically reduced the cost of building monitoring tooling. That much is clear. You can scaffold uptime checks quickly, generate alert logic in minutes, and set-up dashboards faster than most teams used to schedule the kickoff
James Barnes
March 11, 2026
Buy vs Build in the Age of AI (Part 1)
5 min read AI Has Made Building Monitoring Easy. It Hasn’t Made Owning It Any Easier. A few months ago, I spoke to an engineering manager who proudly told me they had rebuilt their monitoring stack over a long weekend. They’d used AI to scaffold synthetic checks. They’d generated alert logic with dynamic thresholds. They’d then wired everything
James Barnes
March 4, 2026
Alerting Is a Socio-Technical System
3 min read In the previous posts, we’ve looked at how alert noise emerges from design decisions, why notification lists fail to create accountability, and why alerts only work when they’re designed around a clear outcome. Taken together, these ideas point to a broader conclusion. That alerting is not just a technical system, it’s a socio-technical one. Alerting
James Barnes
February 25, 2026
Designing Alerts for Action
3 min read In the first two posts of this series, we explored how alert noise emerges from design decisions, and why notification lists fail to create accountability when responsibility is unclear. There’s a deeper issue underneath both of those problems. Many alerting systems are designed without being clear about the outcome they’re meant to produce. When teams
James Barnes
February 18, 2026